Tag Archives: atomic101

Depleted Uranium Toys

Filed under Radiation
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I found these marbles at my father’s house. Uranium has been added to lots of consumer products over the years, often because it makes the products very beautiful.

Also, be sure to see my other uranium\thorium videos:

My radioactive apartment.

Natural uranium tested…

Geiger Counter vs. Scintillator

Filed under Rants & Misc
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Geiger counters are an indispensable tool for any scientist, professional or amateur (like me). The Geiger counter can detect radiation quickly and effectively. They are also relatively cheap, ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars (most are under $1,000). Geiger counters have varying abilities and detect different particles and energy levels of those particles with differing levels of efficiency. By far, beta radiation is detected the best with many tubes detecting 2 to 4 out of ten particles which hit them. Alpha radiation is a bit lower, with many tubes totally blind to them and those which are not only detecting 5 to 10 particles per every 100. Gamma and X-ray radiation is the lowest for Geiger counters, where often between 1 and 3 photons are detected per 100.

Pros — Cheap, easy to use, portable, can detect alpha, beta, gamma, and x-ray.

Cons — Cannot determine isotope (fact), cannot determine energies, very low gamma and x-ray efficiency.

Scintillation counters are the tools of the professional nuclear scientist. Scintillation counters exist for gamma, x-ray, beta, and alpha radiation (a specific unit for each). When used with a multi channel spectrum analyzer, the counter can identify isotopes by their energies. Some Gamma spectrometers can even be used for complex gamma recoil analysis (mossbaur spectroscopy) which aid in determining the molecular bonds of various atoms, such as iron. Crystal sicntillators may cost a few hundred to a few thousand dollars, while a multi channel spectrum analyzer to attach to one is at least a few thousand more. This means an entry level lab-grade unit (like mine) will set you back about $5000. Very powerful soil state units, like those used at universities, can be well beyond $10,000 and even as much as a million dollars. A good High Purity Germanium (HPGe) is at least $10k. These detectors may be used without a multi channel spectrum analyzer, but they only count at that point. Hobbyists have created multi channel spectrum analyzer’s for under 1,000 dollars.

Pros — Can identify isotopes, measures energies, very sensitive to gamma rays (for gamma sicntillators), can probe hyperfine molecular bonds.

Cons — Expensive ($1000 and up), complex, requires extensive skill (physics), portable units are often very expensive.

Links:

Great MCA+Scintillator for entry lab-grade use. This is what I use:
http://www.spectrumtechniques.com/ucs30_system.htm

Small and portable scintillation devices (mega pricy)
http://www.laurussystems.com/IsotopeID.htm

A really great Geiger counter (Inspector EXP+)
http://geigercounters.com/EXP2.htm

Probably the best Scintillation video ever made
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0dF2FUo5WU

What’s in your rain?

I detect the potassium in a single banana… GM can’t do this. =)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_SJH7VNAE0

Uranium! Uranium! Uranium! – A marvelous and amazing element!

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Uranium! Uranium! Uranium!

A marvelous and amazing element!

Uranium 238 Decay Chain

Thorium 234
Protactinium 234m
Uranium 234
Thorium 230
Radium 226
Radon 222
Polonium 214
Lead 214
Bismuth 214
Polonium 210
Lead 210
Bismuth 210
Lead 206 (Stable)

Radiation and Uranium are amazing and powerful.

Like many of natures most powerful creations, Uranium is dangerous and must be treated with respect. Never expose children, pets, or your bare hands to Uranium. If you should ever touch a Uranium sample, always wash your hands carefully.

Remember, distance, time, and shielding, and hand washing are your friends.

As always, don’t try this at home

Radio-isotopic Analysis of Post-Fukushima Accident Japanese Soil Samples

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The full document can be read here
All supporting data can be accessed here
Abstract
Radioactive fallout from the triple reactor disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, following a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami, is readily observed in soil samples collected from Japan, well beyond the exclusion zone. Samples from three regions, approximately 210 km, 550 km, and 1060 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, were tested for gross gamma activity and radio-isotopic composition. The primary isotopes of focus were the most commonly detected radio-isotopes of Cesium, 134 Cs and 137 Cs.

Note: Another individual should be listed as a co-contributor, given their important role in providing material from Japan for testing, but their name has been left out for purposes of anonymity. To that person, go my deepest thanks.

Documents and data used in the report. This data will allow anyone to view and come to their own conclusions. Data transparency is important.

Please remember that this document is Open For Comment until March 11.

Gamma Spectroscopy: Americium 241 Smoke Alarm Tested

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0.9 uCi 241 Am Smoke alarm tested using gamma spectroscopy.