Category Archives: Radiation

What is a Neutron?

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as

More information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
http://www.chem4kids.com/files/atom_neutron.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/particles/proton.html#c3

Detector used in video: Polimaster 1703GNB
http://www.polimaster.us/products/personal_radiation_detectors/pm1703gn/

Voice over at start of video by Emily Linard
https://www.fiverr.com/emilylinard

All graphics shown are property of Anti-Proton.com

☢ Detecting Natural Neutron Radiation! ☢

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , ,

Natural Sources of Neutron Radiation! I detect neutrons from thermal to as high as 14 MeV!

[Neutron Detector/Gamma Spectrometer]
http://www.polimaster.us/products/spectroscopic_personal_radiation_detectors/pm1703mb/

[PoliSmart Dosimeter]
http://www.polimaster.us/products/electronic_dosimeters/pm1904a_/

Nuclear Material Generator!

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Spectrum Techniques Barium 137m Generator is a small device used to generate small quantities of the short lived radio-nuclide Ba137m.

http://www.spectrumtechniques.com/isotope_generator.htm

☢ Radioactive Tritium Gun Sight – Tested! ☢

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , , ,

☢☢☢ Read Details ☢☢☢
A Glock radioactive gun sight is tested to determine how radioactive it might be!

X-Ray Spectrum of Tritium: http://anti-proton.com/tritium2.png
X-Ray Spectrum of Gun Sight: http://anti-proton.com/tritium_gunsight.png

Are Exempt Quantity Nuclear Check Sources Dangerous?

Filed under Radiation, Science
Tagged as , , , , , , , , ,

I am not a doctor, nor a physicist, nor any other qualified person to discuss radiation safety for others. I am merely explaining my own risks using my own sources. Keep that in mind.

Cancer Risk

Cancer occurs when cells in the body are damaged in such a way that they their genetic code is altered allowing them to uncontrollably reproduce. This damage can come from the environment and from errors in how DNA is rewritten.

Current Scientific Consensus (what the majority of scientists agree upon based upon their research and data):

1. Cancer risk rises with respect to dose.
2. There is no dose rate where the risk of cancer (from the dose) is zero.
3. Determining risks from doses less than 100 mSv is statistically difficult.

December, 2008. Williams D. Radiation carcinogenesis: lessons from Chernobyl. Accessed online January, 23 2015 at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956182

The dose of a dental x-ray 5 μSv
The majority of small check sources are less than 10 μSv/hr
The dose of chest x-ray averages 100 μSv
The dose of a CT chest scan averages 7000 μSv
The dose of a CT chest scan averages 4,000,000 μSv

Accessed online January, 20 2015 at http://hps.org/documents/Medical_Exposures_Fact_Sheet.pdf

What are the risks of cancer from any source?

Males
Risk of developing 1 in 2
Risk of dying from 1 in 4

Females
Risk of developing 1 in 3
Risk of dying from 1 in 5

September 24, 2014. Lifetime Risk of Developing or Dying From Cancer. Accessed online January, 23 2015 at http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer

Final conclusion:

A third to half of us will get cancer in our lives. My sources are only a VERY tiny contributor to my risk.